Monday, November 21, 2011
final blog post
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Blogging Finale
Another way this class has helped me grow is by introducing me to technology. As I have openly admitted, I am not the most technically inclined person in the world. I have found myself better able to navigate websites especially Google and blogger, which I had no experience. Instead of rebelling against technology and getting frustrated when using it, I am now able to slow down and think my way through when using it. Technology still isn’t my best friend, but it is not my worst enemy either.
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Blog #9
This class helped me become a better writer, mostly because I wrote about topics that I could actually relate to and that didn’t seem to just be writing in response to a text and a theme that I was forced to fit my research into. Which gave me a wider spectrum to start with for thought process, because usually my biggest problem use to be starting a paper and now I can write papers that are plenty long enough.
The 3-step process helped and hurt me, but in the end made me a better writer because I can classify myself as a writer better. I’ve always known that I have a bad tendency of taking a good idea and then by the end, end up on a different idea. This was magnified by our 3 submission process where the PSA was really focused and then when I went to the SSI the entire purpose that I wrote for had changed. From my thesis to my claims, it was a lot more formal than the PSA, but the change in argument was a much weaker argument. After I finally realized it, even though I knew that it changed, for some reason I didn’t truly grasp it. But when I got that Ah-Ha moment I feel like I’ve finally passed the wall that held me back as a writer throughout all of high school. I always hated English and it was always my worst subject and this quarter, ironically it’s one of my best subjects.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Blog #8
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Blog #8
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Blog #8
My ARP topic fits perfectly, I mean it involves beer. I can play that in a variety of ways to develop it into a Commonplace Essay. The problem that I’m going to have with the commonplace essay is going to be like the ARP where I couldn’t decide exactly which direction to go. I could take the topic of beer in writing for a public audience of couple of different ways. To support the drinking age, to use colleges around the nation as an example as to why the drinking age should be lowered or to just talk about the same topic and talk about how beer and other forms of alcohol have affected our society.
After I finish reading more of the commonplace essays I feel like I will have a better understanding of the best direction to go with my topic. Because right now, I have a lot of possible ideas, but not all of them may end up lining up with the key points of most commonplace essays.
I’m going to go against something against the ‘social norm’. Because that seems to be the more timely kind of subject. The ‘Real Men of Genius’ campaign will definitely help make it unique. As long as commonplace doesn’t ban certain topics related to age appropriate themes (namely sex, drugs and violence) then I should be fine. Beer isn’t as hardcore as these other substitutes. After I pick my essay I want to read through commonplace of manual to ensure that it fits well.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Blog Post #7
Monday, October 31, 2011
Going to the ARP
I’ve got a lot of room to expand just with the current main 2 sources that I used for my SSI. One of the main problems with my SSI though was that I was trying to use one of the sources to set up points and was more forcing it to be something that it wasn’t much of. Now I’ve got another source that fits a little better and can use my original one as a compliment. The weakest part of my paper dealt with transitions and background info of my sources. My current paper is a little over 4 pages, not including the Work Cited, so I think through the addition of my new source and improving the transitions between paragraphs by using my primary source more effectively.
This quarter I’ve gotten much better at research and incorporating my research towards a topic. I think I’ve been more successful than on my papers in High School because I’ve picked such a topic that I’m familiar with and sources (mostly the primary ones) that I’m familiar with), if I was more familiar with my Secondary sources I feel that I probably would have done as good of a job on my SSI as I did on my PSA. Because on my SSI I was told that I was nit-picking and I really felt like I was same with the transitions. So I’m glad that where I thought I stood on my SSI was correct and I just have to continue improving it from there. With the help of my new source.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Turning Five Pages Into Eight
Another way that I’ll expand my SSI is by looking into the ideas Chase presented in my review. In my self-evaluation, I focused on my flaws that have occurred in my previous writings, but he shed light on new errors I hadn’t considered revising. I need to keep a consistent tone and watch the tenses of my writing. In some areas where I added personal narrative, I need to really decide whether they are attributes to my paper or not. And because I plan to incorporate more sources into the ones I already have, I need to do some revising in order to cover all the bases of my paper.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Roseanne Response
Rosanne Response
Post #5
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Blog Post #5
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Blog #5
In Indian Culture there had been a Caste System for many years. In which your ‘class’ or role in life is determined at birth. There was no changing their place no matter how much they resented it. This fits right in with our class theme, Class Warfare. The difference is there isn’t as much war over this because this is believed to be the way that class is handled as deemed by religious texts.
Instead of separating out by Wealth like what we see in the United States, Upper, Middle and Working/Lower Class structure, the caste system separates out by job/duty. The “working class” still remains as a caste, the people who do labor, services and craftsmen are the Shudras. Then they separate those who do more important jobs like farmers as the Vaishyas. The Upper/Aristocratic caste is the Kshatriyas which includes Kings, warriors and people of law. This sounds very similar to our definition of class, but from here is where the differences emerge, the Brahmins are the religious and educational staff/workers like priests and teachers placing them in high respect.
In America teachers and priests can be found among varying class status and usually depends more on their own personal background than anything else. Maybe this accounts how our nation has fallen far behind many others in the field of education. As our culture pushes the respect and higher pay/dignity towards other jobs that are revered as better for the nation.
The final major difference is that foreigners are seen as casteless and then certain foreigners by trade are referred to as untouchables; maybe out of fear of the damage the influence that their culture could do or maybe out of respect, either way in America foreigners in the past have been immediately filed into some of the lowest classes in history among arrival. Americans may accept their culture, but the more that come, the more jobs that are taken away from Americans. Blame in many subjects is constantly shifted to something involving race, religion, or citizenship.
This brings out a more positive view on the caste system, but don’t get me wrong. These are just the aspects that they got right and how they ended up avoiding a lot of class warfare, there is much more to this system enough to write a thesis on. How? Because it has already been done, America may be the “Melting Pot”, but we still have a lot of lessons to learn.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
What I wish I knew.... (blog 4)
From the Bud Light Real Men of Genius Campaign it talks about the treatment of people from the public scope of their jobs. It would be very helpful to know how they are treated by clients, other personal and bosses behind closed doors. While the NFL Cord Carrier guy does hard work on the field and a lot relies on him, after the game maybe the coach takes him out to dinner as thanks. I guess that would also depend though on the person that they are working under. Which some would get lucky like that, and the other ones who are unlucky would get fired after just one game full of problems. Then the Major Highway Line Painter guy, at one point in time had to paint them manually but so much of what we do is automated now. A lot of Bud Light’s Real Men of Genius Campaign probably have not aged very well, there is no Cord Carrier guy, most things are wireless and the major highway line painter guy just drives a truck down a part of the highway that people can’t drive on. In another decade though the tables will turn again and the relevant arguments we come up with now will partially be irrelevant to any argument not involving historical background reasoning.
Jerry Springer brings up a lot of controversial things. But in a time when the President is giving tax cuts and health care to those who “can’t get jobs” and then years ago people were still complaining about how they can’t get jobs no matter how many applications they submit. That’s introduced in his show in the episode I picked, one side of the argument claims that they only filled out like 3 or 4. Do people who don’t have jobs really try to get them or at this point do they just live off of the unemployment checks that the government gives them. It’s a choice they are given, but the money has to come from somewhere and they sure aren’t earning it like the people who have to give the government the money they get. Is the amount that some people receive through unemployment and other programs enough to live off of and allow them to be lazy or does it actually push them to try to get a job and make their own living.